Message282063
| Author |
rhettinger |
| Recipients |
larry, martin.panter, mdk, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年11月30日.04:01:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1480478474.79.0.536067535396.issue28754@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> If adding proper support for hi=None, maybe lo=None should
> also be supported.
That would be gratuitous. Lo already has a reasonable, useful, and self-explanatory value. This would add more complexity to the signature while reducing clarity. I really don't want to see calls like bisect(arr, x, None). |
|