Message280429
| Author |
steve.dower |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, davide.rizzo, gvanrossum, july, mwagner, neologix, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, vajrasky |
| Date |
2016年11月09日.18:35:54 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1478716554.44.0.224264264985.issue19717@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Anyone have any major concerns with add_non_strict_resolve_pathlib_v4.patch?
I'd be quite happy without adding the extra parameter to Path.resolve(), but I'm not strongly offended.
From Guido's email we should default to strict=False (i.e. don't throw if the file doesn't exist) rather than True. |
|