Message278128
| Author |
masamoto |
| Recipients |
donmez, mark.dickinson, masamoto, serhiy.storchaka, twouters, yan12125 |
| Date |
2016年10月05日.14:51:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1475679094.55.0.0209833362288.issue25720@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I tried to build curses module on Cygwin (Vista x86) using #25720 patch. And it has been succeeded.
When test_curses ran without skip condition, it was same result as msg278060 (#28190).
I found out build success reasons for cases of applying patch:
#25720 -- implementation of WINDOW is opaque (*but* WINDOW_HAS_FLAGS is defined at Include/py_curses.h:61 ). However, curses module build went well to cover the _flags field from source code by is_pad.
#14598 -- implementation of WINDOW is not opaque (WINDOWS_HAS_FLAGS is defined at configure script). Therefore, curses module build went well because WINDOW has the _flags field.
#28190 -- implementation of WINDOW is opaque (WINDOW_HAS_FLAGS isn't defined: py_curses.h has been cleaned by patch). Hence, curses module build went well to remove the _flags field from source code at preprocessing.
All case tests on Cygwin have failed at unget_wch. |
|