Message276163
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
MarkusH, berker.peksag, imrehg, martin.panter, rbcollins |
| Date |
2016年09月13日.04:30:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1473741052.86.0.476773243636.issue25895@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
IMO if a versionadded/versionchanged notice is relevant, that is a good sign it is a feature rather than bug fix. If the 3.6.1 documentation says "added in 3.5.3", how do you know if it is in 3.6.0?
I looked at the history of other schemes being added to try and understand if it is a bug fix or not. I guess it is not that clear. In Python 2 the sftp and sips schemes are documented as a new feature in 2.5. Is that why you aren’t proposing any change to 2.7?
imap (Issue 618024), mms (7ec771893410): 2.3 features
rsync (Issue 981299): 2.3 bugfix (3a7e34dc6ae2)
svn: 2.4 bugfix (349a0fd598e0)
sftp (Issue 1407902): 2.5 feature (r42108); 2.4 bugfix reverted (r42123); documented (r42125) with version (r42158)
sips (r43520): 2.5 feature; documented with version
nfs (Issue 4962): 2.7 (r70757), 3.1 (r70760) features; 2.6 bugfix (r81131); undocumented
git (Issue 8657): 2.6, 2.7, 3.1 bugfixes; undocumented
tel (Issue 16713): 2.7, 3.2, 3.3 bugfixes; undocumented |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年09月13日 04:30:52 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, rbcollins, berker.peksag, MarkusH, imrehg |
| 2016年09月13日 04:30:52 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1473741052.86.0.476773243636.issue25895@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年09月13日 04:30:52 | martin.panter | link | issue25895 messages |
| 2016年09月13日 04:30:52 | martin.panter | create |
|