Message275910
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, doko, eric.snow, gregory.p.smith, koobs, loewis, martin.panter, ned.deily, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, python-dev, rpetrov, sbt, trent, vstinner, zach.ware |
| Date |
2016年09月12日.01:49:48 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1473644991.6.0.424294422985.issue15819@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I’m not sure what the overall status of this bug is, so I will leave the versions as they are. Are the three comments from 2013 relevant, and is there anything I can do to help?
The Python 2 code already unconditionally adds -IInclude (see Issue 786737), and does not use BASECPPFLAGS. I think it would better to remove Trent’s code, as in unused-flags.patch.
Python 3 also has this unconditional -IInclude, so maybe we can eliminate one of them in Python 3?
gcc -pthread -c -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror=declaration-after-statement -IObjects -IInclude -IPython -I. -IInclude -I../Include -DPy_BUILD_CORE -o Python/Python-ast.o Python/Python-ast.c |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年09月12日 01:49:51 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, loewis, doko, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, ned.deily, trent, rpetrov, Arfrever, python-dev, sbt, eric.snow, petri.lehtinen, zach.ware, koobs |
| 2016年09月12日 01:49:51 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1473644991.6.0.424294422985.issue15819@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年09月12日 01:49:51 | martin.panter | link | issue15819 messages |
| 2016年09月12日 01:49:50 | martin.panter | create |
|