Message275284
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, tehybel, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2016年09月09日.08:04:22 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1473408262.08.0.233627432388.issue27867@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Then there is a design question. I believe that after all we should expose these two new functions publicly. And the question is about function names and the order of arguments. Currently signatures are:
int _PySlice_Unpack(PyObject *r, Py_ssize_t *start, Py_ssize_t *stop, Py_ssize_t *step);
int _PySlice_EvalIndices(Py_ssize_t *start, Py_ssize_t *stop, Py_ssize_t step, Py_ssize_t length, Py_ssize_t *slicelength);
Are there suggestions for names? Perhaps the second functions should not have prefix PySlice_, since it doesn't work with slice object. |
|