Message274519
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, berwin22, chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, mark, martin.panter, mightyiam, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, segfaulthunter, srid, steve.dower, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年09月06日.04:47:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAMpsgwbzkZO0W+wc2bPQ8H9V7-tOjbP+gV8XMdro2=0M=UYYNA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1473134997.4.0.378663760898.issue6135@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
> a. How do folks feel about providing a new "text" parameter to replace the cryptic "universal_newlines=True" that would explicitly be equivalent to "universal newlines with sys.getdefaultencoding()"?
If it's just text=True, I don't see the point of having two options
with the same purpose.
> b. Given (a), what if the new "text" parameter also accepted a new "subprocess.TextConfig" object in addition to the base behaviour of doing a plain bool(text) check to activate the defaults?
Can you give an example? I don't see how the API would be used. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年09月06日 04:47:40 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, pitrou, mark, eric.araujo, segfaulthunter, Arfrever, r.david.murray, srid, mightyiam, chris.jerdonek, martin.panter, steve.dower, berwin22 |
| 2016年09月06日 04:47:40 | vstinner | link | issue6135 messages |
| 2016年09月06日 04:47:40 | vstinner | create |
|