Message273996
| Author |
kevinconway |
| Recipients |
gvanrossum, kevinconway, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date |
2016年08月31日.04:09:26 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1472616567.5.0.142662854771.issue27906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I've added a unit test to the patch that asserts sock.accept() is called the appropriate number of times.
Worth a note, I had to adjust one of the existing tests to account for the new backlog argument. There is a default value for the argument to preserve backwards compat for any callers, but the mock used in the test was not tolerant of having an extra arg available. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年08月31日 04:09:27 | kevinconway | set | recipients:
+ kevinconway, gvanrossum, vstinner, yselivanov |
| 2016年08月31日 04:09:27 | kevinconway | set | messageid: <1472616567.5.0.142662854771.issue27906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年08月31日 04:09:27 | kevinconway | link | issue27906 messages |
| 2016年08月31日 04:09:27 | kevinconway | create |
|