Message271855
| Author |
John Hagen |
| Recipients |
John Hagen, barry, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman |
| Date |
2016年08月02日.21:31:29 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1470173489.5.0.0761801420703.issue26988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
@Ethan
I reviewed your latest patch. I think it's a good step forward in terms of simplicity. Most of my comments were not major.
Even before this patch, I was mulling around how enum.Unique, enum.UniqueEnum, and enum.unique seemed to violate the "There should be one obvious way to do it" principle, so I like that you omitted those in the latest patch.
Looks good to me, thanks for all of your work! |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年08月02日 21:31:29 | John Hagen | set | recipients:
+ John Hagen, barry, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman |
| 2016年08月02日 21:31:29 | John Hagen | set | messageid: <1470173489.5.0.0761801420703.issue26988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年08月02日 21:31:29 | John Hagen | link | issue26988 messages |
| 2016年08月02日 21:31:29 | John Hagen | create |
|