Message271213
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
Saimadhav.Heblikar, THRlWiTi, Todd.Rovito, philwebster, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2016年07月25日.02:35:41 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1469414142.52.0.890234668826.issue18766@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I opened #27609 to keep track of multiple completion issues. Some additions to what I said above.
1. I would like to move the actual fetch code to run.py, since it is normally executed in the user process. See #27534, but also below.
2. Idle currently differentiates between completion invocation by <tab> or '.' and by <<force-completions>>, which defaults to Cntl-space. I believe a main difference is that it will only call functions in the object expression, as in "f().", in the latter case. I believe the distinction operates by calling for completions or not. (I need to check.)
That distinction can be used here by only importing with <<force-completion>>, and then it should. With that limitation, I think I am now in favor of adding this. Importing a module is roughly equivalent to calling a function. Either can do anything. But the distinction has be known within the fetch code. This could be done with a wrapper function. |
|