Message269670
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
abarry, methane, r.david.murray, vinay.sajip |
| Date |
2016年07月01日.14:15:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1467382546.71.0.991308438775.issue27424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Domain names should never have non-ascii in them. They should be IDNA encoded. There is a known problem where Windows will return non-ascii domain names if the local hostname is configured naively (see issue 9377). SMTPUTF8 might be a workaround in smtpd's case, since I think it will allow handling of such domain names, but that could actually be considered an RFC violation in smtpd if it works :)
That said, looking at the traceback I'm not convinced that's the problem. The test using support.HOST, and that is 127.0.0.1. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年07月01日 14:15:46 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, vinay.sajip, methane, abarry |
| 2016年07月01日 14:15:46 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1467382546.71.0.991308438775.issue27424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年07月01日 14:15:46 | r.david.murray | link | issue27424 messages |
| 2016年07月01日 14:15:46 | r.david.murray | create |
|