Message 269513 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	yselivanov
Recipients	gvanrossum, j1m, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2016年06月29日.15:05:09
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1467212710.14.0.733442317541.issue27392@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> However, IMO, it's useful to be able to accept a connection outside of an asyncio event loop and then hand the loop the connected socket. Looks like what you're asking for is a way to wrap existing socket object into a (transport, protocol) pair. I'm -1 to add this new semantics to loop.create_connection, as I think it will complicate it too much. However, we can consider adding something like loop.wrap_socket(protocol_factory, sock) -> Transport

Content

> However, IMO, it's useful to be able to accept a connection outside of an asyncio event loop and then hand the loop the connected socket.
Looks like what you're asking for is a way to wrap existing socket object into a (transport, protocol) pair. I'm -1 to add this new semantics to loop.create_connection, as I think it will complicate it too much.
However, we can consider adding something like 
 loop.wrap_socket(protocol_factory, sock) -> Transport

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016年06月29日 15:05:10	yselivanov	set	recipients: + yselivanov, gvanrossum, vstinner, j1m
2016年06月29日 15:05:10	yselivanov	set	messageid: <1467212710.14.0.733442317541.issue27392@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016年06月29日 15:05:10	yselivanov	link	issue27392 messages
2016年06月29日 15:05:09	yselivanov	create

homepage