Message269497
| Author |
Rotkraut |
| Recipients |
Rotkraut, demian.brecht, harobed, martin.panter, orsenthil, petri.lehtinen, piotr.dobrogost, pitrou, whitemice |
| Date |
2016年06月29日.14:14:22 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1467209671.55.0.791039647909.issue12319@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Here comes a new version of the patch. I believe, I addressed all review comments made on issue12319_7.patch, with the exception of the EncodingError mentioned in the last post.
Most relevant changes compared to last patch:
* Do not try to dertermine the content length for text files.
* Change priority of object types for the body: try file like before byte like.
* Convert byte like to bytes before feeding the body into the socket. This fixes Issue 27340, at least as far as http.client is concerned.
* Split test_http() in one separate test for each body type in test_urllib2.py.
* Review documentation.
Another question is: what is the best method to test whether a file like is text or binary? For the moment, I kept the original code that essentially does:
try:
isText = "b" not in readable.mode
except AttributeError:
isText = False
This logic fails for StringIO and possibly others. Alternatives could be:
isText = isinstance(readable, io.TextIOBase)
isText = hasattr(readable, 'encoding')
or
isText = isinstance(readable.read(0), str)
What do you guys suggest? |
|