This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | barry |
|---|---|
| Recipients | adrien-saladin, barry, berker.peksag, kxroberto, martin.panter, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger |
| Date | 2016年06月13日.08:45:28 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <20160613114514.59d08c27@python.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1465806861.56.0.666508562874.issue10839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Jun 13, 2016, at 08:34 AM, Berker Peksag wrote: >Berker Peksag added the comment: > >> I think we just need to plumb a `policy` argument through to the ultimate >> base class, email.message.Message > >That's already possible: https://docs.python.org/dev/library/email.message.html#email.message.Message > >It would be nice to be able to customize 'policy' via BaseMime: >https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/email/mime/base.py#L23 Right, that's what I meant by "plumb". :) Basically we want all the subclasses of email.message.Message to accept a `policy` argument and pass them to their superclass constructors. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016年06月13日 08:45:29 | barry | set | recipients: + barry, rhettinger, kxroberto, r.david.murray, adrien-saladin, python-dev, berker.peksag, martin.panter |
| 2016年06月13日 08:45:29 | barry | link | issue10839 messages |
| 2016年06月13日 08:45:28 | barry | create | |