Message 268163 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	rhettinger
Recipients	christian.heimes, dstufft, martin.panter, rhettinger, tim.peters, vstinner
Date	2016年06月10日.22:07:40
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1465596460.62.0.631064042432.issue27272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> But I'll be happiest if nothing changes here (given that Guido ruled > yesterday that Python's current urandom() implementation has to be > reverted to once again match Linux's non-blocking urandom() behavior). With urandom() behavior restored, can we close this?

Content

> But I'll be happiest if nothing changes here (given that Guido ruled
> yesterday that Python's current urandom() implementation has to be 
> reverted to once again match Linux's non-blocking urandom() behavior).
With urandom() behavior restored, can we close this?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016年06月10日 22:07:40	rhettinger	set	recipients: + rhettinger, tim.peters, vstinner, christian.heimes, martin.panter, dstufft
2016年06月10日 22:07:40	rhettinger	set	messageid: <1465596460.62.0.631064042432.issue27272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016年06月10日 22:07:40	rhettinger	link	issue27272 messages
2016年06月10日 22:07:40	rhettinger	create

homepage