Message267939
| Author |
larry |
| Recipients |
Colm Buckley, Lukasa, Theodore Tso, alex, doko, dstufft, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitti, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane |
| Date |
2016年06月09日.00:07:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1465430820.9.0.725286875966.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Regardless of the behavior of os.urandom (and 'import random'), is it agreed that the current state of _PyRandom_Init is acceptable for 3.5.2?
I'll get back to you with a specific yes or no. What I want is that it the behavior removed where "import random" can block unboundedly on Linux because it's waiting for the entropy pool to fill. If the code behaves like that, then yes, but I'm not giving it my official blessing until I read it. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年06月09日 00:07:01 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, ncoghlan, vstinner, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, dstufft, pitti, Lukasa, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley, Theodore Tso |
| 2016年06月09日 00:07:00 | larry | set | messageid: <1465430820.9.0.725286875966.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年06月09日 00:07:00 | larry | link | issue26839 messages |
| 2016年06月09日 00:07:00 | larry | create |
|