Message267721
| Author |
larry |
| Recipients |
Colm Buckley, Lukasa, alex, christian.heimes, doko, dstufft, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ned.deily, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane |
| Date |
2016年06月07日.18:46:22 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1465325182.51.0.564699591196.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
That reminds me. I want to be clear: I think it's preferable that os.urandom() blocks when insufficient entropy is available. If Victor's patch changed that, it should be backed out.
(Since non-blocking urandom is useful, perhaps in 3.6 os.urandom() should take a new "block=True" parameter. But it's too late to add it for 3.5.) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年06月07日 18:46:22 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, vstinner, christian.heimes, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, dstufft, Lukasa, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley |
| 2016年06月07日 18:46:22 | larry | set | messageid: <1465325182.51.0.564699591196.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年06月07日 18:46:22 | larry | link | issue26839 messages |
| 2016年06月07日 18:46:22 | larry | create |
|