Message267617
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Colm Buckley, doko, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ned.deily, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane |
| Date |
2016年06月07日.10:15:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1465294540.67.0.112026096832.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Martin Panter (msg267511): "Maybe an alternative would be to add a special PYTHONHASHSEED=best-effort (or whatever) value that says if there is no entropy available, use a predictable hash seed. That would force whoever starts the Python process to be aware of the problem."
In my experience, it's better if users don't touch security :-) It's better if Python simply makes the best choices regarding to security. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年06月07日 10:15:40 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, larry, matejcik, ned.deily, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley |
| 2016年06月07日 10:15:40 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1465294540.67.0.112026096832.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年06月07日 10:15:40 | vstinner | link | issue26839 messages |
| 2016年06月07日 10:15:40 | vstinner | create |
|