Message267477
| Author |
eric.fahlgren |
| Recipients |
Barun Parruck, eric.fahlgren, llllllllll, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date |
2016年06月05日.21:15:47 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAP2Qz+WtLi8NgR-5yj1bFt2kWOHo+Z08yjKoo-jSARLQY0Cf4g@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1465140634.34.0.71890428988.issue26448@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Thanks, Serhiy. I sort of figured that it would get fixed with the
wordcode rework, and was going to verify that it was when 3.6 settled down.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:
>
> Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
>
> This bug was fixed in issue26881 with similar patch. Sorry, I didn't know
> about this issue. Your patches look good. In any case thank you for your
> effort.
>
> ----------
> nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
> resolution: -> out of date
> stage: -> resolved
> status: open -> closed
> superseder: -> modulefinder should reuse the dis module
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26448>
> _______________________________________
> |
|