Message267189
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
chris.jerdonek, docs@python, martin.panter, r.david.murray, rhettinger, tbeadle, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2016年06月03日.23:35:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1464996907.28.0.0900764931165.issue15476@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Not sure why it doesn’t come up in the code review, but in
diff --git a/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst b/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
index c0b4930..f34ba9f 100644
--- a/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
+++ b/Doc/reference/datamodel.rst
@@ -847,8 +847,10 @@ Internal types
Code objects
+
.. index::
single: bytecode
+ single: code object
object: code
Code objects represent *byte-compiled* executable Python code, or :term:`bytecode`.
that added blank line seems to also cause the same definition list problem as before :( |
|