Message266926
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
Jonathan Kamens, Paolo Veglia, benjamin.peterson, jmadden, marcjofre, martin.panter, pitrou, pje, serhiy.storchaka, stutzbach, tarek |
| Date |
2016年06月02日.19:21:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1464895278.03.0.516887927231.issue24291@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
It looks to me that there is two opposite ways to resolve this issue.
1. Document the requirement for write() and raise an exception if write() returned not the size of full data. But I think it would be more user-friendly first emit a warning and continue calling write() until full data is written.
2. Don't document any requirement, but just silently handle partial writing.
wsgiref-only.patch contains parts from both ways. It documents new requirement, but doesn't deprecate partial writing. What way is chosen? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年06月02日 19:21:18 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, pje, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, tarek, stutzbach, martin.panter, jmadden, Jonathan Kamens, marcjofre, Paolo Veglia |
| 2016年06月02日 19:21:18 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1464895278.03.0.516887927231.issue24291@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年06月02日 19:21:18 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue24291 messages |
| 2016年06月02日 19:21:17 | serhiy.storchaka | create |
|