This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Andrew.Lutomirski, belopolsky, eddygeek, eltoder, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2016年05月15日.21:21:40 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1463347300.82.0.985031520925.issue20371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
By the way, when I say "again", I'm referring to the "return type of alternative constructors" thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/python-dev@python.org/msg92163.html This is effectively an extension of that discussion, because replace is an alternative constructor, with the additional complication of taking an existing instance as input. Rereading that thread, I think Guido's answer is that the subclass API needs to be clearly documented: http://www.mail-archive.com/python-dev@python.org/msg92191.html Which I guess means we get to decide what it is, and then figure out how to implement it. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016年05月15日 21:21:40 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, belopolsky, eltoder, serhiy.storchaka, Andrew.Lutomirski, eddygeek |
| 2016年05月15日 21:21:40 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1463347300.82.0.985031520925.issue20371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年05月15日 21:21:40 | r.david.murray | link | issue20371 messages |
| 2016年05月15日 21:21:40 | r.david.murray | create | |