Message264990
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, gvanrossum, serhiy.storchaka, ztane |
| Date |
2016年05月06日.16:38:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAP7+vJJs7_Mwad_uduaV7Qqe4kjHmc7PLm3fu=XYsaPVnFhVVQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1462479012.59.0.509030882852.issue26906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Sadly it's been a very long time since I wrote that code and I don't recall
much about it. I presume there was a good reason for not to do it in
_PyType_Lookup(), but who knows -- maybe the oroginal approach was just too
naive and nobody cared? I'm not excited by a patch that does this for 38
types -- invariably there will be another type that still surfaces the same
bug. |
|