Message264658
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
brett.cannon, francismb, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date |
2016年05月02日.18:43:41 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1462214621.69.0.68244567926.issue26219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'm confused by the relationship between this and issue 26110. That seems to be a much simpler patch (which also doesn't apply cleanly). If 26110 really increases method calls by 20%, what does this add? (By which I mean (a) what additional optimizations does it have, and (b) what additional speedup does it have?)
I'm asking because I'm still trying to look for reasons why I should accept PEP 509, and this is brought up as a reason. |
|