Message264624
| Author |
steve.dower |
| Recipients |
loewis, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware |
| Date |
2016年05月02日.06:09:12 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1462169352.9.0.712404993977.issue23903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
As I recall, the tool is ready to go. The problem is the argument over what to do with all the APIs that currently are incorrect. Zach had a list at PyCon last year, and the consensus seemed to be that "someone" should figure out whether each API should be stable or not. Since Zach understandably doesn't want to be that someone, there's really no way to reliably tool this process when there are a number of existing violations.
(FWIW, I believe we should just add them to the stable list, as that's the only way to guarantee source compatibility. They've already shipped in 3.5 and people can use them on non-Windows OSs.) |
|