Message264071
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
StyXman, christian.heimes, martin.panter, neologix, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年04月23日.22:35:24 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAMpsgwb22g5qHegumFwtZbYb=GMm0BQ3y+S+79ZbP4bDBnCeTQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1461439464.32.0.546175420918.issue26826@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Kerbel support ok, but what about the libc support? Do you know if it is
planned? Or do you want to use the syscall() low-level API. If we take the
syscall() path, I suggest to make the function private in the os module.
Wait until the API is standardized in the libc. Sometimes the libc changes
minor things, ir's not always a thin wrapper to the syscall. |
|