This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, eric.snow, larry, ncoghlan, random832, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang |
| Date | 2016年04月21日.09:41:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwb9DURkzzSYj6m9kCBSZ54SHvOBFuSfixegv7pa5azHvw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1461230907.99.0.397877017338.issue26811@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Oh, I see "The property() getter calls are up to 25% faster. (Contributed by Joe Jevnik in issue 23910.)" in https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.5.html#optimizations Hum... This is embarrassing :-/ Ok, let's keep it, but we must fix it ;-) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016年04月21日 09:41:20 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, brett.cannon, rhettinger, ncoghlan, larry, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, random832, xiang.zhang |
| 2016年04月21日 09:41:19 | vstinner | link | issue26811 messages |
| 2016年04月21日 09:41:19 | vstinner | create | |