Message263501
| Author |
methane |
| Recipients |
IanLee1521, Rosuav, berker.peksag, gvanrossum, methane |
| Date |
2016年04月15日.15:50:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAEfz+TyKnh4jiai-MUKzuXfP=hQr6y2rUmaiXGYA+n4v5R0+hQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1460730710.57.0.504506870228.issue26763@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:
>
> Guido van Rossum added the comment:
>
> I don't like the way "):" is indented in that example.
Me too.
I haven't know about this PEP8 update.
https://github.com/python/peps/commit/843b7d2cdb954dc0aa5ea70f140db2bd42943e1f
> I propose:
>
> if ((width == 0
> and height == 0
> and color == 'red'
> and emphasis == 'strong')
> or highlight > 100):
>
>
Looks better to me. But how about this?
if (width == 0
and height == 0
and color == 'red'
and emphasis == 'strong'
or highlight > 100):
Changing indentation level based on operator precedence is acceptable? |
|