Message261507
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
njs, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年03月10日.16:07:55 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1457626076.89.0.677921944213.issue26530@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Antoine Pitrou:
> This may indeed be useful but:
> - those functions should be no-ops when tracing isn't enabled (so as to be as fast as possible)
Done
> - you should take the GIL if necessary (but only if tracing is enabled, of course)
Ok, done.
The new patch has a safer API:
* _PyTraceMalloc_Track() can be called twice with the same pointer: the old trace is removed, a new trace is added
* _PyTraceMalloc_Track() ensures that the GIL is hold
* _PyTraceMalloc_Track() & _PyTraceMalloc_Untrack() do nothing if tracemalloc is disabled
I also added unit tests. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年03月10日 16:07:57 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, pitrou, njs |
| 2016年03月10日 16:07:56 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1457626076.89.0.677921944213.issue26530@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年03月10日 16:07:56 | vstinner | link | issue26530 messages |
| 2016年03月10日 16:07:56 | vstinner | create |
|