Message261183
| Author |
alecsandru.patrascu |
| Recipients |
alecsandru.patrascu, brett.cannon, gregory.p.smith, lemburg, methane, pitrou, r.david.murray, scoder, skrah, steve.dower, zach.ware |
| Date |
2016年03月04日.07:18:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1457075911.33.0.0325673189975.issue25702@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
From our experience, pybench only is not a representative benchmark. Instead, if you like to measure performance close to real workloads, you can run the Grand Unified Python Benchmark suite, that is more complete.
Also, you need to take into consideration the hardware and software environment. For this, you can read the initial comment at this issue, section "Hardware and OS Configuration", to see the approach we have here at Intel. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年03月04日 07:18:31 | alecsandru.patrascu | set | recipients:
+ alecsandru.patrascu, lemburg, brett.cannon, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, scoder, r.david.murray, methane, skrah, zach.ware, steve.dower |
| 2016年03月04日 07:18:31 | alecsandru.patrascu | set | messageid: <1457075911.33.0.0325673189975.issue25702@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年03月04日 07:18:31 | alecsandru.patrascu | link | issue25702 messages |
| 2016年03月04日 07:18:30 | alecsandru.patrascu | create |
|