Message 261028 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	belopolsky
Recipients	Sriram Rajagopalan, belopolsky, gregory.p.smith
Date	2016年02月29日.22:54:41
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1456786481.55.0.114298759742.issue26460@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> Python's time.strptime() behavior is consistent with that of glibc 2.19 Gregory, I believe OP is complaining about the way datetime.datetime.strptime() behaves, not time.strptime() which is mentioned as (preferred?) alternative. See msg261015 in issue 14157 for context.

Content

> Python's time.strptime() behavior is consistent with that of glibc 2.19
Gregory,
I believe OP is complaining about the way datetime.datetime.strptime() behaves, not time.strptime() which is mentioned as (preferred?) alternative.
See msg261015 in issue 14157 for context.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016年02月29日 22:54:41	belopolsky	set	recipients: + belopolsky, gregory.p.smith, Sriram Rajagopalan
2016年02月29日 22:54:41	belopolsky	set	messageid: <1456786481.55.0.114298759742.issue26460@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016年02月29日 22:54:41	belopolsky	link	issue26460 messages
2016年02月29日 22:54:41	belopolsky	create

homepage