Message260675
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Yury.Selivanov, alecsandru.patrascu, catalin.manciu, jtaylor, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date |
2016年02月22日.12:56:33 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1456145793.88.0.656552687759.issue26249@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Compared to my proposition in issue #26382, this patch yields slightly better results for CPython 3.6, gaining an average of +0.36% on GUPB,
and similar results for CPython 2.7.
IMHO this change is too young to be backported to Python 2.7. I wrote it for Python 3.6 only. For Python 2.7, I suggest to write patches with narrow scope, as you did for the patch only modifying the list type.
"""
Table 1: CPython 3 GUPB results
-------------------------------
unpickle_list 22.74%
mako_v2 9.13%
nqueens 6.32%
meteor_contest 5.61%
fannkuch 5.34%
simple_logging 5.28%
formatted_logging 5.06%
"""
I surprised to see slow-down, but I prefer to think that changes smaller than 5% are pure noise.
The good news is the long list of benchmarks with speedup larger than 5.0% :-) 22% on unpick list is nice to have too! |
|