Message260266
| Author |
deronnax |
| Recipients |
Alexander.Belopolsky, Anders.Hovmöller, Arfrever, barry, belopolsky, berker.peksag, cvrebert, davydov, deronnax, eric.araujo, flying sheep, jcea, jstasiak, jwilk, karlcow, kirpit, martin.panter, mcepl, mihaic, nagle, pbryan, perey, piotr.dobrogost, r.david.murray, roysmith, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年02月14日.08:17:16 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1455437836.25.0.608748139239.issue15873@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
#12006 will unfortunately of no use for this one.
Actually, I realized that the best implementation of parsing rfc 3339 is in django dateparse utils. To me it's the finest, the most elegant, and no other one can claim to be more robust since it's probably the #1 iso parsing functions used in python. Have a look at https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.9/_modules/django/utils/dateparse/#parse_datetime
Alexander, I won't start before I have your opinion. What do you think ? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年02月14日 08:17:16 | deronnax | set | recipients:
+ deronnax, barry, jcea, roysmith, belopolsky, nagle, vstinner, jwilk, mcepl, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, davydov, cvrebert, karlcow, Alexander.Belopolsky, perey, flying sheep, mihaic, berker.peksag, martin.panter, piotr.dobrogost, kirpit, Anders.Hovmöller, jstasiak, pbryan |
| 2016年02月14日 08:17:16 | deronnax | set | messageid: <1455437836.25.0.608748139239.issue15873@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年02月14日 08:17:16 | deronnax | link | issue15873 messages |
| 2016年02月14日 08:17:16 | deronnax | create |
|