Message259970
| Author |
ned.deily |
| Recipients |
emptysquare, gvanrossum, martin.panter, ned.deily, ronaldoussoren, yselivanov |
| Date |
2016年02月10日.03:25:35 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1455074735.69.0.394933024834.issue25924@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I agree that the approach in "try 2" is fine and the runtime check in "try 3" is overkill. While it is possible to do so, we've never really supported building on an OS X release n for release m, where m < n, without using the m SDK on n (and in particular for m=10.4) in which case the "try 2" test should work correctly. Ronald, what do you think? |
|