Message259671
| Author |
yselivanov |
| Recipients |
Yury.Selivanov, casevh, josh.r, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner, yselivanov, zbyrne |
| Date |
2016年02月05日.16:18:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1454689139.54.0.847757149171.issue21955@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Between fastintfloat_alt.patch and fastint5.patch, I prefer fastintfloat_alt.patch which is much easier to read, so probably much easier to debug. I hate huge macro when I have to debug code in gdb :-( I also like very much the idea of *reusing* existing functions, rather than duplicating code.
I disagree.
fastintfloat_alt exports a lot of functions from longobject/floatobject, something that I really don't like. Lots of repetitive code in ceval.c also make it harder to make sure everything is correct. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年02月05日 16:18:59 | yselivanov | set | recipients:
+ yselivanov, lemburg, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, skrah, Yury.Selivanov, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r, zbyrne |
| 2016年02月05日 16:18:59 | yselivanov | set | messageid: <1454689139.54.0.847757149171.issue21955@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年02月05日 16:18:59 | yselivanov | link | issue21955 messages |
| 2016年02月05日 16:18:59 | yselivanov | create |
|