Message 259655 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	martin.panter
Recipients	jstasiak, martin.panter, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2016年02月05日.12:05:50
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1454673950.71.0.473737065174.issue26292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
Is deprecating RawIOBase.writelines() an option, and only recommending BufferedIOBase.writelines() and TextIOBase.writelines()? Otherwise, I think it would make most sense to keep retrying until all the data is written. This mirrors how I understand readline() and readall() work (keeps reading until it gets as much as necessary). For non-blocking mode, readline() does not support that (see Issue 13858). It does not make much sense to me to have writelines() support non-blocking mode either.

Content

Is deprecating RawIOBase.writelines() an option, and only recommending BufferedIOBase.writelines() and TextIOBase.writelines()?
Otherwise, I think it would make most sense to keep retrying until all the data is written. This mirrors how I understand readline() and readall() work (keeps reading until it gets as much as necessary).
For non-blocking mode, readline() does not support that (see Issue 13858). It does not make much sense to me to have writelines() support non-blocking mode either.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016年02月05日 12:05:50	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, pitrou, vstinner, jstasiak
2016年02月05日 12:05:50	martin.panter	set	messageid: <1454673950.71.0.473737065174.issue26292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016年02月05日 12:05:50	martin.panter	link	issue26292 messages
2016年02月05日 12:05:50	martin.panter	create

homepage