Message259568
| Author |
Yury.Selivanov |
| Recipients |
Yury.Selivanov, casevh, josh.r, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov, zbyrne |
| Date |
2016年02月04日.14:27:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<C0A9FF8E-9047-4903-8F10-8DC6F27F5EF0@gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<56B35F2D.6050504@free.fr> |
| Content |
>> But it is faster. That's visible on many benchmarks. Even simple
> timeit oneliners can show that. Probably it's because that such
> benchmarks usually combine floats and ints, i.e. "2 * smth" instead of
> "2.0 * smth".
>
> So it's not about FP-related calculations anymore. It's about ints
> having become slower ;-)
I should have written 2 * smth_float vs 2.0 * smth_float |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年02月04日 14:27:22 | Yury.Selivanov | set | recipients:
+ Yury.Selivanov, lemburg, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, josh.r, zbyrne |
| 2016年02月04日 14:27:21 | Yury.Selivanov | link | issue21955 messages |
| 2016年02月04日 14:27:21 | Yury.Selivanov | create |
|