Message259390
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
Yury.Selivanov, jtaylor, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date |
2016年02月02日.14:48:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1454424518.45.0.277729800673.issue26249@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
>> It looks like some benchmarks are up to 4% faster:
> What this says is that some internals uses of PyMem_XXX should be replaced with PyObject_XXX.
Why not changing PyMem_XXX to use the same fast allocator than PyObject_XXX? (as proposed in this issue)
FYI we now also have the PyMem_RawXXX family :) |
|