Message259014
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
berker.peksag, martin.panter, vlee |
| Date |
2016年01月27日.11:17:43 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1453893463.13.0.997298689864.issue24841@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
The two changes to test_ssl.py look okay to me, although they will need updating since the Issue 24841 changeover to pythontest.net.
But I don’t think it is a good idea to add ENOTCONN to the list of errors ignored by all transient_internet() tests. In most cases, ENOTCONN suggests a programming error, not a network problem. I think a better solution would be to call connect_ex() again in test_non_blocking_connect_ex(), and retrieve the result (probably also ECONNREFUSED like the other failures, or 0 if successful). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年01月27日 11:17:43 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, berker.peksag, vlee |
| 2016年01月27日 11:17:43 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1453893463.13.0.997298689864.issue24841@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年01月27日 11:17:43 | martin.panter | link | issue24841 messages |
| 2016年01月27日 11:17:43 | martin.panter | create |
|