Message258108
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年01月12日.16:29:08 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAP7+vJJ2+gibh9CT-GjOLHqnMYotaQMiOh3ZH3t_bzcupWfR1g@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAMpsgwZrNkKYrC8MjC_WHqnGj3drhLGAB0KzhhSAhdm=cHozXA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
Could we make this feature available at the Python level too? It sounds
really useful.
--Guido (mobile)
On Jan 12, 2016 2:01 AM, "STINNER Victor" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> STINNER Victor added the comment:
>
> See my old issue #10833 which proposed to *remove* the arbitrary limit
> on strings. It was rejected.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26090>
> _______________________________________
> |
|