Message258038
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, maciej.szulik, martin.panter, willingc |
| Date |
2016年01月11日.23:17:10 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1452554230.3.0.0508834376526.issue23942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I guess if people wonder about this, you could at least say the naming doesn’t matter very much for the review system.
If I am generating my own patches, I try to name them with one or two concise words describing the particular solution, and then insert ".v2", ".v3" etc for the revised patches. If I just gave them an issue number, it would get lost my Mercurial patch queue among a sea of other numbers. If I did not add the ".v2" revision number, people would have to refer to the patches by upload date rather than name or version. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年01月11日 23:17:10 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, ezio.melotti, maciej.szulik, willingc |
| 2016年01月11日 23:17:10 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1452554230.3.0.0508834376526.issue23942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年01月11日 23:17:10 | martin.panter | link | issue23942 messages |
| 2016年01月11日 23:17:10 | martin.panter | create |
|