Message258018
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
benhoyt, gvanrossum, larry, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年01月11日.21:10:38 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1452546638.83.0.379676976312.issue25995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I don't like the first solution (it just collects all scandir() results in a list, which defeats one of the purposes of using scandir()), but I don't understand the second solution.
Ideally the number of FDs used should be limited by the depth of the tree being walked, right? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2016年01月11日 21:10:38 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, vstinner, larry, benhoyt, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2016年01月11日 21:10:38 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1452546638.83.0.379676976312.issue25995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016年01月11日 21:10:38 | gvanrossum | link | issue25995 messages |
| 2016年01月11日 21:10:38 | gvanrossum | create |
|