Message257679
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
benhoyt, ethan.furman, gvanrossum, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2016年01月07日.08:53:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAMpsgwZii_ZgFzNMS9NSVAuqM5ry7KQBw4qsSxoHazD3xjmRRQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<CAP7+vJJPFGD--1D48KJGMNUMEbBwi+SSzxj6eBrBadcx_C+0GQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
"Another question: for symlinks, there are two different possible stat
results: one for stat() and one for lstat(). Are these both cached
separately?"
Hopefully, both are cached. It's directly the result of stat() and
stat(follow_symlinks=False) which are cached (so a os.stat_result
object). |
|