Message256591
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
SilentGhost, acucci, belopolsky, berker.peksag, cvrebert, elixir, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, jerry.elmore, lemburg, martin.panter, matrixise, r.david.murray, skip.montanaro, terry.reedy, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2015年12月17日.08:35:55 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1450341355.31.0.260458713723.issue19475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
If the timespec allowed any arbitrary number of digits after the decimal point, that would remove any argument about nanoseconds not being supported. It would also mean I could use this in one case where I currently format to two decimal places (my compromise between accurate timestamps and excessive information). Just a suggestion :) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年12月17日 08:35:55 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, skip.montanaro, terry.reedy, belopolsky, vstinner, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, cvrebert, SilentGhost, berker.peksag, matrixise, elixir, jerry.elmore, acucci |
| 2015年12月17日 08:35:55 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1450341355.31.0.260458713723.issue19475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年12月17日 08:35:55 | martin.panter | link | issue19475 messages |
| 2015年12月17日 08:35:55 | martin.panter | create |
|