Message256383
| Author |
abarry |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, David MacIver, Kevin Shweh, Tijs Van Oevelen, abarry, arigo, donmez, ezio.melotti, fijall, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, torsten |
| Date |
2015年12月14日.15:54:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1450108485.1.0.696682300896.issue25843@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I see. Is there any to special-case those so that only closures use that? Maybe by checking on the function object itself - the function itself would be quite similar, as well.
@Mark - I think you've misunderstood me (others did too, so I'm going to assume I just explained poorly) - I'm not debating the use of comparing code objects, I'm talking about the implicit replacement of code objects in functions. However, it seems to be of use, so outright removing the behaviour isn't an option. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年12月14日 15:54:45 | abarry | set | recipients:
+ abarry, arigo, rhettinger, ncoghlan, donmez, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, torsten, BreamoreBoy, fijall, serhiy.storchaka, David MacIver, Kevin Shweh, Tijs Van Oevelen |
| 2015年12月14日 15:54:45 | abarry | set | messageid: <1450108485.1.0.696682300896.issue25843@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年12月14日 15:54:45 | abarry | link | issue25843 messages |
| 2015年12月14日 15:54:44 | abarry | create |
|