homepage

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients Mark Lundeberg, mark.dickinson, vstinner
Date 2015年12月11日.14:45:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1449845135.73.0.83556680124.issue25839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> As I understand the output of repr() is supposed to be something that can evaluated to recreate the same object.
Right, but that's an ideal that's not always achieved in practice. If I had my druthers, I'd 'fix' the repr of the complex object to return something that's written in terms of the constructor (for example, "complex(2.3, -0.0)"). I don't think that's a reasonable change from the POV of backwards compatibility though.
History
Date User Action Args
2015年12月11日 14:45:35mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, vstinner, Mark Lundeberg
2015年12月11日 14:45:35mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1449845135.73.0.83556680124.issue25839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015年12月11日 14:45:35mark.dickinsonlinkissue25839 messages
2015年12月11日 14:45:35mark.dickinsoncreate

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /