Message255990
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
bquinlan, docs@python, gumblex, martin.panter, ryder.lewis |
| Date |
2015年12月05日.23:05:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1449356717.5.0.510551782321.issue23962@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
A similar problem used to exist with asyncio.TimeoutError: Issue 21376.
There is no class called concurrent.future.Error, so I would remove that bit. Otherwise, the rest of the patch looks worthwhile.
With asyncio and multiprocessing, the exception name is spelt out in full, including the module prefix. Maybe it could also be done here to be less ambiguous. When reading it with an ordinary web browser, you don’t get to see the target of the hyperlinks. On the other hand, a full "concurrent.futures.TimeoutError" is rather long and unwieldy. I’m not sure. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年12月05日 23:05:17 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, bquinlan, docs@python, ryder.lewis, gumblex |
| 2015年12月05日 23:05:17 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1449356717.5.0.510551782321.issue23962@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年12月05日 23:05:17 | martin.panter | link | issue23962 messages |
| 2015年12月05日 23:05:17 | martin.panter | create |
|