Message255982
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
SilentGhost, aroberge, docs@python, larry, martin.panter, random832 |
| Date |
2015年12月05日.21:52:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1449352378.63.0.594993074667.issue25810@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
See Issue 23738 where my current patch proposes using the PEP 457 slash (/) notation in the RST documentation, including for eval(). I’m not sure if there is a clear concensus for applying my patch however. An alternative would be to use the square-bracket notation, and explain in the text that the default values are None.
See also Issue 21314 about explaining the slash notation used by Argument Clinic and pydoc. |
|