Message254514
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
Justin Mayfield, gvanrossum, thehesiod, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date |
2015年11月12日.04:59:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1447304382.87.0.264315316523.issue25593@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Thanks, but I don't like the idea of that patch. It feels like a hack that makes it less likely that the issue occurs, but I don't feel we should rely on the callbacks being called before checking the selector again. There may be other reasons (perhaps a future modification to the code) why we might occasionally check the selector redundantly. IOW I think we should really ensure that all I/O callbacks are properly idempotent. |
|