Message252175
| Author |
v+python |
| Recipients |
martin.panter, orsenthil, oscar.campos, quentel, v+python |
| Date |
2015年10月02日.23:10:10 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1443827410.81.0.00511755246354.issue14565@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Martin, thanks for the recent activity in this area. Sorry I've not yet learned how to submit patches. python_dev keeps busy changing the process and tools, and I keep busy with other projects, having patched a version of http-server well enough for my personal needs.
Your analysis that this is a new feature because the code doesn't support it, and the documentation is vague has some merit.
On the other hand, the reason I called it a behavior bug in the first place is comparison to other web servers that support multi-part paths to cgi scripts indicates it is clearly deficient by comparison... and the documentation isn't explicit enough to say so, so it can be considered a "deficient" if not "buggy" implementation. Certainly, any attempt to port a real web site that depends heavily on cgi scripts to http-server would be extremely likely to fail due to this deficiency, that is not documented as a limitation of the "generally expected" abilities of a web server.
It'd sure be nice to fix it, whether it is called a bug or an enhancement, and the fix is in the comments above. |
|